santa clara county superior court tentative rulings

408.882.2296 (fax) V. FCA US, LLC, ET AL. 1 Complex Civil Litigation matters are heard Wednesdays at 1:30 p.m. or as specially set by the Court. NICHOLAS VINCENT SERIO V. LVNV FUNDING, LLC, ET AL. Your recipients will receive an email with this envelope shortly and Last. 8 MARIIA KRAVCHUK VS TAYLOR MORRISON OF CALIFORNIA, LLC. SUNNYVALE/SANTA CLARA EL POLLO 12 KERRY WILLIAM SCRIBNER, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiff, FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION 14 ruling, and you have not previously been informed that you are excused from the calendar, 7 7 Check Jury Reporting Status. INTRODUCTION ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.; and INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Maria Cordova (Cordova) alleges she slipped and fell in a supermarket operated by defendant Safeway, Inc. (doing business as Safeway Rivermark Market) (Safeway). . Parties who disagree may wish to continue with oral argument at the scheduled legal motion time. Defendants Dr. Nicholas Kokkalis (Kokkalis), Dr. Chengdiao Fan (Fan), Pi Community Company (Pi) and SocialChain, Inc. (Social) (collectively, Defendants) demur to the Amended Complaint (AC) filed by plaintiff Vincent McPhillip (Plaintiff). This is an action for declaratory and injunctive relief. OF THE PARTY CONTESTING THE TENTATIVE RULING OR; 2. BENEDICT LOBO V. INTEL MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS NORTH AMERICA INC., ET AL. 5 Before the Court is Plaintiffs motion for approval of a settlement, which is unopposed. Your recipients will receive an email with this envelope shortly and (Complaint, IT-1.) BELINDA JONES AND DESMOND JONES V. FCA US, LLC, ET AL. If you desire to appear and present oral argument, YOU MUST NOTIFY the Judicial Assistant by telephone at (707) 521-6602 and all other opposing parties of your intent to appear no later than 24 hours prior to the scheduled hearing date. Filter by a specific county without spaces. Tentative rulings may be accessed on the Civil Case Management Calendar ext. California Rule of Court 3.1308, Local Rule 4.05.3. Background and Discovery Dispute NATIONAL ENTERPRISE SYSTEMS, INC., an On the afternoon of the court day before each calendar, the judges Filter by a specific county without spaces. try clicking the minimize button instead. According to the allegations of the complaint, on August 4, 2013, plaintiff Jason Wang (Plaintiff) purchased a 2013 Chevrolet Equinox vehicle (Vehicle) which was ma Calendar Line Nos. JURORS to reschedule your jury service without coming to court, click here. Defendants Jaim Nulman (Nulman) and Yali Pharmaceutical, Ltd. (Yali) (collectively, Defendants) demur to the complaint (Complaint) filed by plaintiff Avelyn Welczer (Plaintiff). V. KATHY KEJIE ZHANG, PAMELA SHERE CHAMBERS V. MERCHANTS & MEDICAL CREDIT CORPORATION, INC., ET. SHANNON SANCHEZ V. ABACUS BUSINESS CORPORATION GROUP, INC., ET AL. I. 9 12 ALEXANDER CHARLES and HENRY MULAK, as individuals, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiffs, FOR JUDGMENT ON THE 14 PLEADINGS Parties objecting to the tentative ruling shall also notify all parties of the objection and the intent to appear and argue by 4:00 p.m. on the day prior to the hearing. Local Forms; Judicial Council Forms; Self-Prep and File; Fee Schedule; Self-Help. LTD V. VASILY TROMFIMCHUCK ET AL, DAVID BAEZ ET AL VS CALIFORNIA MEDICAL BOARD. INTRODUCTION will be able to access it on trellis. 24 This is an action for wrongful foreclosure. I. ORION LISTUG, ET AL. 9 Plaintiff Elle W. Ko (Ko) was sexually assaulted at defendant Shawn Mackenzies (Mackenzie) business, Vivre Fitness, by an employee named Delmar Richard Robertson (Robertson). GARDEN CITY, INC. V. ERIC SWALLOW, ET AL. Last. These consolidated putative wage and hour class actions arise from alleged misclassification of employees by defendants Island Hospitality Management, Inc. and Island Hospitality Management, LLC (collectively, Island). of its intention to appear. Physician Michael Black sued Cable News Network, Inc. (CNN) for defamation after it ran a story about high mortality rates for infants and children undergoing open heart surgery in the Pe Medical Center Currently before the Court are the demurrer and motion to strike by defendant Kathy Kejie Zhang (Defendant). DATE: 24 June 2021 TIME: 9:0 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA If you were scheduled for a court appearance during the COVID-19 Pandemic, and your hearing did not take place, please continue to check this system for updates on your new court appearance date. 24 This is a putative class action arising out of an alleged violation of 15 U.S.C. 1) Violation of Civil Code 2923.4; Prior to the scheduled hearing of a Law and Motion, Complex Civil Litigation or a Discovery matter, the Court may issue a tentative ruling, in the discretion of the judge. Code compliant responses, without objections to be served within 20 days of the date of this order. : 20CV369101 Niketha Shetty v. Mountain View Whisman School Dist. 12 DAVID CHAI, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiffs, TO COMPEL ARBITRATION; 14 MOTION TO COMPEL FURTHER vs. 17 corporation; RICHARD A. VOSS, an individual; The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 22 follows: 17 CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation and 6 asks the responding party to: IDENTIFY all payments m MOTION FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT MICHAEL SCHMITZ ET AL VS HEALTHIQ RE, INC. ALPHA OMEGA HOUSE CORPORATION VS THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY, LABOR COMMISSIONER FOR THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA V. CANTON PROSPECT INC., ET. Judge William J. Monahan discloses he has an inactive real estate brokers license. TERRESTRIAL DEVELOPMENT LLC ET AL VS JAY BLOUNT ET AL. In August 2017 Plaintiff was informed that the property had been sold to Defendants Fortune Realty LLC a First Thank you for visiting the Superior Court's Tentative Ruling web page for Department 3, Complex Civil Litigation, Judge Patricia M. Lucas presiding. Tentative rulings in Santa Clara County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil cases. INTRODUCTION II. Plaintiff Wells Fargo Bank (Plaintiff) filed its motion for summary judgment as to its first cause of action for breach of contract and its second cause of action for common counts, based on the same set of transactions. to you, or if you have further questions regarding a CMP hearing, please contact the For information about getting help through the Self Help Center/Family Law Facilitators Office click here. The Court now issues its tentative ruling 24 as follows: Line 4 BACKGROUND: 24 This is a putative class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations. A tentative ruling is the proposed ruling of the court. CABLE NEWS NETWORK, INC. V. THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY, ET AL. This is an action involving an automobile accident. 5 This is a putative class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations. RESTAURANT All Tentative Rulings may be accessed below. If you need to get the Acrobat Reader, visit the Adobe Website. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 20 on September 7, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. You will need the free Adobe Acrobat Reader to view and print certain rulings. IN RE MCAFEE, INC. : 21CV378097 Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. Civil Order to Show Cause ext. This is a personal injury action. This is a putative class action on behalf of individuals who sent emails to users of Googles email service Gmail, alleging violations of the California Invasion of Privacy Act (CIPA) and the wiretapping statutes of several other states. Plaintiffs Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2 (collectively, Plaintiffs) bring this action against defendants Union School District (District), three of its employees (Employees) and a former teacher, Samuel Neipp (Teacher), for damages associated with sexual abuse. will be able to access it on trellis. Footnote 18: 19 8 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA SINCO TECHNOLOGIES PTE LTD V. SOON, ET AL. If you do not have access to the Internet during the time period when the rulings are posted and you wish to obtain your tentative ruling, please call (408) 882-2515 for assistance. Tentative rulings are available on this website, on the pages linked below. 22 I. All parties appearing on the Law and Motion V. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, ET AL. (Bank). LY, ET AL. 9 You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. Tentative rulings in Santa Clara County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil cases. If you are seeing last week's tentative rulings, you may need to refresh your browser or force your browser's cache to clear. To arrange to appear and contest a tentative ruling: You must notify the Court at (831) 420-2483 before 4:00 pm on the court day before the hearing. 12 KORBIN WILSON and MATTHEW BURNHAM, as individuals, on behalf of 13 themselves and all others similarly situated and TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION the State of California as a private attorney FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF 14 general, CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT 15 Plaintiffs, For West Slope Civil hearings call: 530-621-6551 for West Slope Family Law hearings call: 530-621-6725 for South Lake Tahoe hearings call: 530-573-3042. Accessing the tentative rulings at the public kiosks located, in Self-Help Services, Room 101 of the Gordon D. Schaber Courthouse or Room 212 of the Hall of Justice Building. Defendants motion followed Newarks -4 (See Fourth First 22 I. INTRODUCTI 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA 53 and 916-874-7848 for Department 54. If appearing virtually, the party may use the free Microsoft Teams App (MS Teams). Patient sought the medical servi and 5 V. COOK GROUP, INC., ET AL. : 20CV368229 Pacific Office Designs, Inc. v. Spot On Consulting Group, et al. : 21C37691 This is the home page for the Self Help section of the Superior Court's website in Santa Clara County. V. GENERAL MOTORS, LLC, ET AL. Plaintiffs motion for entry of default is DENIED, for many reasons. CASE NO. 5. INTRODUCTION 16 public benefit corporation; and DOES 1 through SOUTH BAY PIPING INDUSTRY LABOR MANAGEMENT TRUST V. PACIFIC PLUMBING &. ET AL. ANDRES ALEJANDRO MERCADO V. SECURITY INDUSTRY SPECIALISTS, INC., ET AL. 16 VASONA MANAGEMENT, INC., a California SILVIA HERNANDEZ V. WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, ET AL. A.) V. STEVENS CREEK QUARRY, INC., ET AL. Background at (916) 874-2615 by 4:00 p.m. the Court day before the hearing and advise opposing counsel ZL TECHNOLOGIES, INC. Your recipients will receive an email with this envelope shortly and This is a class action alleging that defendants misclassified employees as independent contractors and committed other wage and hour violations. for each matter on the next day's calendar. (Brennon B. v. Superior Court of Contra Costa County (Cal. Before the Court is plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed. Rulings will remain accessible until the next weeks rulings are posted. Defendants Motion for Summary Adjudication MERRYFIELDS V. STEVE DIMAGGIO INC., ET AL. 12 ALORICA INC., a Delaware corporation, 13 Plaintiff, TENTATIVE RULING RE: DEMURRER TO FORTINET INC.S 14 vs. FIRST AMENDED CROSS- COMPLAINT 17 The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Patricia M. Lucas 18 on June 16, 2021 at 1:30 p.m. in Depar 10 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA 1 This is a products liability, fraud, and medical malpractice case. (2) Motion to be Relieved from Admissions and Discovery Sanctions SHAREHOLDER LITIGATION (CONSOLIDATED ACTION) (FORMERLY GREENBERG V. MCAFEE), SAN FRANCISCO PIZZA, INC., ET AL. (Id.) 16 Ohio corporation; and DOES 1 through 10, 18 al. 12 Plaintiff filed a complaint against Defend 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA ROBERT & LUCY PATTERSON V. KIA MOTORS AMERICA, INC., ET AL. RESPONSES 882.2240 To contest the ruling, call (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 P.M. LAW & MOTION TENTATIVE RULINGS Tentative Rulings of the Superior Court of California, County of San Mateo. VS. MARIA OSEGUERA, ET AL. 15 HUGHES, DANNY JORDAN, EVET LOEWEN, HIDDEN ELEPHANT, INC. VS LIMBIC SOFTWARE, INC. CHING-YAO CHU ET AL VS CREATIVE HABITAT, INC. a.) 17 DOES 1-100, inclusive, SINCO TECHNOLOGIES PTE LTD V. SOON, ET AL. This action arises out of a business dispute between plaintiff Tongtai Machine and Tool Co., Ltd. (Tongtai) and defendant and cross-complainant Nano Systems, Inc., (Nano). 23 I. HELEN THERESA GIVENS V. ROY ANTHONY GIVENS, ET AL. ROADRUNNER PETROLEUM, INC. Factual and Procedural Background ET AL, MARCO MARTIN ET AL VS LAS CASITAS APARTMENTS ET AL, PATRICIA JERKOVICH VS. IGNATIUS AZZARELLO ET AL. TONGTAI MACHINE AND TOOL CO., LTD. V. NANO SYSTEM, INC., ET AL. State that you are appearing to contest the tentative ruling. and DOES 1 through 20, inclusive, to Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint FORREST HUFF V. SECURITAS SECURITY SERVICES USA, INC., ET AL. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 3 follows: IAN MCCRAY V. MARRIOTT HOTEL SERVICES, INC., ET AL. 22 I. 18CV328572, 19CV343607], REPRESENTACIONES Y CONTROL ADMINSTRATIVO S.A. DE C.V. VS YAANA TECHNOLOGIES, LLC. According to the allegations of the operative first amended complaint (FAC), Plaintiff and Defendant were coworkers at East Side Union High Schoo Motion to Compel Arbitration Plaintiff Benedict Lobo (Lobo) began working as a Software Engineer for defendant Intel Mobile Communications North America Inc. (Intel) in October 2014. ABRAHAM OSEGUERA, ET AL. Click on the Judge's name below for more details. : 19CV343562 Fourfront Sales, Inc. v. Finisar Corporation, et al. 2. TAYLOR CAPITO V. SAN JOSE HEALTHCARE SYSTEM LP, DBA REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER. JESUS CHAVEZ V. GUESS? TENTATIVE RULING RE: PETITION CASES FOR COORDINATION AND MOTION LEADFACTORS, LLC V. CISCO SYSTEMS, INC., ET AL. WESTLAKE FLOORING COMPANY LLC V. FRIENDLY WHOLESALERS OF CAL. Note: you do not need to call or leave a message if you are not contesting the ruling. For more information, please see the Remote Appearance page. JILL STEARNS V. GULESSERIAN BROS., INC., ET AL. Case no. MARKO VLADISLAVICH V. JAMES L. DAWSON, ET AL. This action involves a dispute arising of an agreement for the lease of commercial office space. These cross-actions arise from an accident on a construction worksite in which plaintiff Ruben Mendoza was injured. smanoukian@scscourt.org (For Clerk's Use Only) http://www.scscourt.org Department Guardianships - Tentative Rulings- Upcoming Remote Appearance Dates: Mondays, 1:30 p.m. calendar1:30 PM - Phone #: 1-(877) 873-8017 - Access Code Department Probate - Tentative Rulings Department Other - Tentative Rulings 2009 Superior Court of Shasta County Contact| Site Map| Jobs| ADA| Disclaimer v. The Ranch Golf Club, et al. This is a commercial landlord/tenant dispute. TAITT V. FIRST COAST SECURITY SERVICES, INC. PHILLIP MARTIN V. BAKEMARK USA, LLC, ET AL. RAMIREZ, ET AL. I. V. MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC., ET AL. Any argument is limited to five minutes. NICHOLS V. NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORP., ET AL. ((See Declaration of (Richard J. & TECH., INC. V. FORTUNE COMPANIES MGMT. by clicking the Inbox on the top right hand corner. This is highly valuable data that reveals how judges think on substantive legal issues. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 21 on October 12, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. 17 GREGORY L. SIMENDINGER, individually and The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 21 follows: Tentative rulings issued by Department 3 will be accessible on this page after 2:00 p.m. on the court day preceding the scheduled hearing. Background Footnote 17: Defendants. 24 This is a putative class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code Violations. I. PORTFOLIO RECOVERY ASSOCIATES, LLC, 4 On May 26, 2015, defendants Skanska USA Inc. (erroneously sued as Skanska USA, Inc.); Skanska USA Building Inc. (erroneously sued as Skanska USA Building, Inc.); DPR Construction, Inc.; Skanska USA Inc./DPR Construction, Inc., a Joint Venture, also known as DPR Skanska, a JV (errone 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA 12 PERLA GUADALUPE SILVA MAGANA, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiffs, FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF 14 CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT vs. Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. A. 18 INTRODUCTION If the tentative ruling does not require appearances, and is accepted, no appearance is necessary. Civil Tentative Rulings. PRESERVATION OF BENEFIT PLAN RETIREES ASSOCIATION, ET AL. 6. 6 ALYSSA E. DAVILLA, ET AL., V. FOSTER POULTRY FARMS, ET AL. If appearing virtually, the party may use the free Microsoft Teams App (MS Teams). by clicking the Inbox on the top right hand corner. Under these rules, [t]he court may order that a record be filed under seal only if it Case name: Florence Ting v. Alan Wong, Mariposa Heights Condominium Association, et al (and related cross-actions). an appearance is required. Contact Us. CourtCall is . 18 LOCO, LLC; W.K.S. INTRODUCTION JUSTIN SCHOELKOPH V. NORTH AMERICAN ON-SITE, LLC, ET AL. The motion was timely filed and served. 16 LEEDEMAN V. SUNRISE CREDIT SERVICES, INC. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 21 follows: Parties may appear remotely using Zoom. Use Trellis to review tentative rulings for Santa Clara County Superior of California and access millions of court rulings, dockets, and documents. TANASE, WAYNE TANDA, NONA TOBIN, Defendant Foster Poultry Farms Motion for Summary Judgment or, in the Alternative, Summary Adjudication Case no. 408.882.2296 (fax) Case Names: Mark Gomez, et al. 16 vs. The tentative ruling will become the order of the Court, and no hearing will be held, unless a party contests the tentative ruling. Footnote 16: CORPORATION; and DOES 1 to 100, inclusive, Background She asserts a cause of action against Safeway for premises liability (negligence). JOHNSON V. DRILL TECH DRILLING & SHORING, INC. BONNIE KESSNER, ET AL. 23 I. 408.882.2296 (fax) Proc. ARTEM KOSHKALDA VS REBELLOS TOWING SERVICES, INC. If no party has requested oral argument, appearances are not required and the tentative ruling will be adopted as the ruling of the Court. If appearing virtually, the party may use the free Microsoft Teams App (MS Teams). On this page, you will find every civil tentative ruling from Santa Clara County Superior. dedicated phone number for the department as referenced in the local telephone 2021 Superior Court of California, County of San Diego. Civil Law and Motion Tentative Rulings are usually available the . On June 16, 2016, plaintiff Paul Ervin (Plaintiff) was traveling on Interstate 880 near The Alameda exit in San Jose, when a vehicle owned and operated by defendants Porchezhiyan Madhavan (husband) and Indumathy Dakshinamurthy (wife) (collectively, Defendants) rear-ended Plaintiffs vehicl Demurrer of Defendant JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A. V. CITY OF SAN JOSE, ET AL. Family Law, Family Preservation Court, Domestic Violence Restraining and Civil Harassment Restraining Orders. SIGRID R. WILLIAMS V. PREMIER SPECIALTY BRANDS LLC, ET AL. 17 RANDAL TURNER, STEVEN TURNER AND I. This action is stayed pending the resolution of Santa Clara County Superior Court, Case No. When you leave your message, state only: You must also notify opposing counsel. To clear your cache hold down the CTRL and F5 buttons at the same time. SHUFF V. STEVENS CREEK QUARRY, INC., ET AL. On the court day before each Friday calendar, a tentative ruling will be published JOHNATHAN E. LOOPER V. SKANSKA USA INC., ET AL. V. HARPER, ET AL. 12 IN RE QUANTUM CORP. SUPERIOR COURT VS. AGSW HAMILTON PLAZA OWNER. Plaintiff Elizabeth Cardoso (Plaintiff) brings this action against defendant Edward Bright (Defendant) for damages associated with intentional infliction of emotional distress. Sacramento Superior Court The 25 Third Amended Complaint, whic al. AKBAR MATANI, ET AL. (First Amended Complaint (FAC), 5.) 14 You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 22 follows: Before the Court is defendants motion to stay the entire action pending the resolution of bankruptcy proceedings filed by defendant Art of Reflexology Newark, LLC. CORP., ET AL. Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. PRESERVATION OF BENEFIT PLAN RETIREES ASSOCIATION, ET AL. DAVID MAAS, BARRY NG, ANITA PHAGAN, 12 WALTER MANAY, an individual, JOSE UMANZOR, an individual, individually, and on 13 behalf of aggrieved employees pursuant to the TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Private Attorneys General Act, FOR APPROVAL OF PRIVATE 14 ATTORNEYS GENERAL ACT Plaintiffs, SETTLEMENT 1 26 This is a putative class action. If you wish to keep the information in your envelope between pages, become the final order of the Court pursuant to The tentative ruling shall become 25 According to the allegations of the Fourth Amended Compla 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA HOLLY WRIGHT, ET AL. 14 BENEFICIARY OF DECEASED CITY 408.882.2296 (fax) smanoukian@scscourt.org http://www.scscourt.org (For Clerk's Use Only) CASE NO. 23 This is a putative class action. SANTA CLARA COUNTY FEDERAL CREDIT UNION V. SHAHEEN, FOURFRONT SALES, INC. VS FINISAR CORPORATION, UBIQUITI NETWORKS, INC. V. NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE CO. OF PITTSBURGH, PA. KEVIN CHRISTIAN ET AL. Skip to main content. 12 ALORICA INC., a Delaware corporation, 13 Plaintiff, TENTATIVE RULING RE: SPECIAL MOTION TO STRIKE FORTINET, 14 vs. INC.S FIRST AMENDED CROSS- COMPLAINT IN PART 15 FORTINET INC., a Delaware corporation, and IV. Gloria Estillore (Plaintiff) brings this action against Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc., U.S. Bank N.A., as trustee on behalf of the holders of J.P. Morgan Alternative Loan Trust 2007-A2 mortgage pass through certificates, and Peter Carey (Defendants) for damages associated with wrongful foreclosure. Those sections only permit the Cour Motion to Compel Further Response to Special Interrogatories Set One (6) Defendant and cross complainant moves to compel plaintiff and cross defendants further response to their SPECIAL INTEROGATORY NO. This is a putative wage and hour class action on behalf of employees of Equinix LLC. Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. In December 2016, Nguye and 6 (First Amended Complaint (FAC), 1.) RAINA ANTLE V. SKINSPIRIT SKINCARE CLINIC AND SPA, ET AL. Factual and Procedural Background This is a medical malpractice action initiated by plaintiff Raina Antle (Antle) against defendants Skinspirit Skincare Clinic and Spa, Skinspir Defendant/cross-complainant/cross-defendant Jeannette D. Kennedy, as Trustee of the Jeannette D. Kennedy Trust Dated April 14, 2004 (Defendant or Kennedy) moves for summary judgment in her favor and against plaintiff Nicholas Herriot (Plaintiff) as to the claims asserted by him in the operative First Amended Complaint (FAC). 26 This is a putative class action. If you do not find information regarding your particular case on the tentative GUYSI V. BOMBARDIER TRANSPORTATION SERVICES USA CORPORATION ET AL. Factual and Procedural Background V. UNION SCHOOL DIST., ET AL. will publish a tentative ruling on each matter on the next day's 23 I. Several of the defendants in these consolidated actions have made cross-c DEMURRER (PAGA), JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A, VS CHERYL POLAND, KATALYST DEVELOPMENT, LLC VS GABRIEL MICHEL ET AL. Civil Law and Motion ext. CALLAN, ET AL. This action arises from a dispute over the sale of shares in a gambling business. Any party who wishes to be heard in response or opposition to the Court's tentative ruling MUST NOTIFY the Court's Judicial Assistant by telephone at (707) 521-6893 and MUST NOTIFY all other parties of the intent to appear, and whether they will appear in person or by Zoom. REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER OF SAN JOSE, ET AL. Santa Clara County Superior Court - Hall of Justice Physical : 190-200 West Hedding Street San Jose , CA 95110 Mailing : 191 North 1st Street San Jose , CA 95113 Phone: 408-808-6600 Website | Directions The Santa Clara County Superior Court Hall of Justice hears criminal cases. To arrange an appearance to contest a tentative ruling, notify the Court at (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. on the court day before the hearing. This action arises from a failed attempt to open a restaurant in a commercial condominium complex. You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, This is a lemon law action brought by Plaintiffs Brian Crook and Donna Bloom (Plaintiffs) against Defendants Ford Motor Company and Santa Margarita Ford (Defendants). I. 23 I. ARRAYIT CORPORATION, a Nevada MILLER V. CORE ANALYTICS LABORATORY, INC., ET AL. VINCENT MCPHILLIP VS NICOLAS KOKKALIS ET AL. Probate Tentative Rulings. . The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle on February 28, 2020, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. V. COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA DBA SANTA CLARA VALLEY. 15 vs. 24 Search public court records from the Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara online for free with easy to use case search tools for finding court cases and case summaries by case number, case name, party, attorney, judge, docket entry, filing date, courthouse, case type, party type, party representation, and more. INTELLISOFT, LTD. V. ACER AMERICA CORPORATION, ET AL. BELL INVESTMENT PARTNERS, LLC V. DD STONEBROOK DRIVE, LLC, ET AL. Family Law Tentative Rulings. RETAIL, INC., ET AL. LLC, et al. This is a putative class action on behalf of employees of SIMCO Electronics. VS. BAO NGUYEN ET AL. (1) Defendants Motion to Compel Responses and Deem Requests for Admission, Admitted BRIAN PETERS V. RFI ENTERPRISES, INC., ET AL. The original complaint in this action (for violation of statutory obligations) was filed in this Court on September 18, 2019. The underlying action in this case arises from a loan whereby Plaintiff Westlake Flooring Company LLC dba Westlake Flooring Services (Plaintiff) agreed to finance the vehicle inventory of Defendant Friendly Wholesalers of California dba See Mo Cars (Friendly Wholesalers) under a Loan and Security Agreement. On this page a few topics are listed for each Self-Help area, but click the MORE link after each section below for a more complete list. BERMAN-CHEUNG, ET AL. According to the allegations of the second amended complaint (SAC), on January 30, 2016, plaintiff Thu Minh Tran (Tran), on behalf of plaintiff My Crawfish, Inc. (My Crawfish) (collectively, Plaintiffs), and defendant Ly T Truc Nguyen (Nguyen) and nonparty Joanne Vuong (Vuong) entered into an agreement in which Plaintiffs agreed to sell -4 ROBERT WILSON, SHAREHOLDER LITIGATION, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Consolidated action, including: FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS 14 Greenberg v. McAfee, Inc., Santa Clara County ACTION SETTLEMENT Superior Court, 15 Colwell v. McAfee, Inc., Santa Clara County Being Your Own Lawyer; Tentative Rulings; Court Reporting; Forms & Filing. INSTITUTE FOR BUS. 23 I. On March 6, 2019, plaintiffs filed a Doe amendment naming Michael J. Laptalo, JL Precisions owner and president, as a defendant to the action. Plaintiffs, 12 DAVID GUYSI, on behalf of himself, all others similarly situated, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiff, FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS 14 ACTION SETTLEMENT vs. : 19CV359530 22 I. V. COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA DBA VALLEY HEALTH PLAN. JANE DOE 1, AND JANE DOE 2 V. UNION SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL. The tentative ruling becomes the order of the court, and no hearing is held, unless one of the parties contests the tentative ruling by complying with California Rules of Court 3.1308 and Local Rule 2.10. You can always see your envelopes APPSINTEGRATION, INC. V. RAMTEK SOLUTIONS, LLC. If you do not have access to the Internet during the time period when the rulings are posted you may call (831) 420-2300 (Chambers) for assistance in obtaining your tentative ruling. (First Amended Complaint (FAC), 17.) CALIFORNIA SPINE AND NEUROSURGERY INSTITUTE V. AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES U.S., INC., TONI INGRAM VS CASAVINA FOUNDATION CORPORATION ET AL. 17 RESTAURANT GROUP, INC.; (LEAD CASE) [CONSOLIDATED WITH CASE NO. This action arises from a scam that uses images and videos of plaintiff Steve Wozniak and other famous tech entrepreneurs to fraudulently induce individuals to transfer their cryptocurrency to the scammers. 14 Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. SUPERIOR COURT VS. JOHN MUIR MEDICAL GROUP, MERIDIAN AT WILLOW GLEN HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION VS TAYLOR MORRISON OF CALIFORNIA, LLC, MILON V. DAVID & ESPERANZA CHAVEZ FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP DBA CHAVEZ SUPERMARKET. Superior Court of CA County of San Joaquin Select Your Language English Spanish Chinese Russian Filipino Punjabi Khmer Vietnamese Arabic Persian Hmong SMALLER. directory, between the hours of 2:00 p.m. and 4:00 p.m. on the court day before 22 According to the allegations of the Complaint, filed on March 21, Motion to Compel Responses to Discovery V. NGUYEN, ET AL. V. ARVIND SRINIVASAN, ET AL. 16 HEALTHIQ RE, INC., a California corporation; 17 Corporation; and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, Before the Court is defendant Mandarich Law Group, LLPs motion for an order granting its subsequent application for summary judgment on the issue of [its] cure pursuant to Cal. Adding your team is easy in the "Manage Company Users" tab. 11 I. To Join Department 23 Zoom By Phone Call 1 669 900 6833 US (San Jose) Enter Meeting ID 854-4114-2253. make a tentative ruling on the merits of this matter by 2:00 p.m., the court day Currently before the Court is the demurrer by defendants Aenta, Inc., Aetna Life Insurance Company, and SAP America, Inc. (SAP America) (collectively, Defendants) to the first amended complaint (FAC) of plaintiff California Spine and Neurosurgery Institute (Plaintiff). INTRODUCTION 3 If you wish to keep the information in your envelope between pages, Request a Fine Reduction Online: If you are unable to pay the full amount due, you may request the court consider your ability to pay and reduce the bail or ask the court to consider community service instead of your bail. Before the Court is plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed. Department of Child Support Services Cases. (See FAC, IT-1, subpara. 22 I. V. SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING, INC. LORIE ANN GUZMAN V. MANDARICH LAW GROUP, LLP, ET AL. Tentative rulings in Santa Clara County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil cases. 12 FRANKLIN AMOG, as an individual and on behalf of all others similarly situated, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiff, FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF 14 CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT vs. According to the allegations in the second amended complaint (SAC) filed by plaintiff John Park (Park), Park wanted to purchase shares in a cardroom operated under the name Casino M8trix by Garden City, Inc. (Garden City). Defendants Motion for Summary Adjudication Co. (1963) 217 Cal.App.2d 678, 698-699 ["items appear . California Rules of Court, rules 2.550 and 2.551 govern the sealing of court records. This is a class action arising from allegations that defendant Laptalo Enterprises, Inc. dba JL Precision imposed illegal time rounding and break policies on its employees. V. FARIMA YEGANEGI, D.C., ET AL. 21 I. How Do I Find a Tentative Ruling? If no request for appearance is made, the tentative ruling will 3 Tentative Rulings. The Court now issue 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Footnote 15: YOU MUST CALL (650) 261-5102 BEFORE 4:00 P.M. WITH THE CASE NAME, NUMBER, AND THE NAME OF THE PARTY CONTESTING. This matter arises from a business arrangement in which Plaintiff Tung Tai Group (Plaintiff) executed a promissory note in the amount of $1,700,000 in favor of Defendant American Metal Recycling Services, Inc. (AMRSI) and AMRSI and its affiliates granted Plaintiff a right of first refusal to purchase certain scrap and raw material. V. VPM MANAGEMENT, INC., ET AL. Effective October 1, 2009, Placer County Superior Court is no longer hearing a Family Law Case Management Calendar. Any party who wishes to be heard in response or opposition to the Court's tentative ruling MUST NOTIFY the Court's Judicial Assistant by telephone at (707) 521-6893 and MUST NOTIFY all other parties of the intent to . try clicking the minimize button instead. CHARGE (RISC). Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. If you wish to keep the information in your envelope between pages, 21 I. 6 In this section. 7 A tentative ruling is a preliminary ruling that states how a court intends to rule on a motion, and courts may modify or reverse civil tentative rulings prior to issuing final rulings, hence the term tentative.. LEE WEBSTER V. PLATINUM PARKING MANAGEMENT, LLC, ET AL. 17 KRISHNAMACHARI; GAETANO RICCI, and CAL. Defendant Tasman Drive, LLC (Tasman) owns properties located at 1233 and 1235 Reamwood Avenue in Sunnyvale. FORESITE CAPITAL MANAGEMENT IV, LP V. ESFANDYARPOUR, ET AL. Code 3294(a). The Department is located in the Downtown Superior Courthouse (DTS) at 191 North First Street in San Jose. Court's LAGOS V. THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY, ET AL. MENDOZA V. PLANNED PARENTHOOD MAR MONTE, INC. KENNETH ROSENBERG V. BMW OF NORTH AMERICA, LLC, SUNPOWER CORPORATION VS MARTIN DEBONO ET AL, CALIFORNIA SPINE AND NEUROSURGERY INST. 22 I. Sanctions were requested pursuant to CCP 2030.290(c) 2031.300(c) and 2033.280(C). SUPERIOR COURT VS. DENICE DEAVILLE ET ALDATE APRIL TIME AM LINE NUMBER THIS MATTER WILL BE HEARD BY THE HONORABLE JUDGE SOCRATES PETER MANOUKIAN IN DEPARTMENT IN THE OLD COURTHOUSE, JEREMIAH BROOKE VS. On February 4, 2019, plaintiff Jatinder Mann (Plaintiff) filed his Complaint against defendants Cenlar FSB, CitiMortgage, Inc., and Quality Loan Service asserting causes of action for: On February 5, 2016, plaintiff Monique M. Davilla (Davilla), individually and on behalf of A.E.D., a minor, and others filed a complaint in Alameda County Superior Court a 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA WebThank you for visiting the Superior Court's Tentative Ruling web page for Department 2, Judge Drew Takaichi presiding. 5 Both notifications must be completed no later than 4:00 p.m. on the court day immediately preceding the day of the hearing. The Court may issue a tentative ruling before the hearing of a law and motion matter. You do not need to call or leave a message if you are not contesting the ruling. However, this tentative ruling information is usually taken down from the court's website after several days or weeks. TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT. calendar. 16 GEORGE RIOS, GARY SHOENNAUER, KEN Factual and Procedural Background Compliance matters include any matter scheduled for a Friday morning Background January 16, 2023. VEOLIA TECHNICAL SOLUTIONS, LLC V. ALL METALS, INC., ET AL. 15 FORTINET INC., a Delaware corporation, and 4 I. 24 I. C. Factual Case no. Santa Clara Valley Transp. Currently before the Court are the demurrer and motion to strike by defendant General Motors LLC (Defendant). 17 as Alpha Omega House Corp. v. The Leland Stanford Junior University, et al. This is a lemon law action. Footnote 15: 18CV327382]. Factual and Procedural Background -2 If you are unable to access the Court's public access site and need the tentative ruling read INTRODUCTION Posted August 22, 2018 PUBLIC NOTICE: Traffic ticket fines may now be paid online by visiting https://portal.scscourt.org/traffic Posted July 9, 2018 PUBLIC NOTICE: 22 I. INTROD 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA CHEYTESHIA MATTHEWS VS. ATTORNEY FEES AND COSTS EHEALTHINSURANCE SERVICES. DOES 1 through 100, in 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Check your tentative ruling for the most up-to-date instructions for court appearances, including the procedure to request oral argument. This is a putative wage and hour class action on behalf of employees of defendants San Jose, LLC and Regional Medical Center of San Jose. Pay Traffic Tickets. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 20 on October 12, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. SILVACO, INC. V. OLE CHRISTIAN ANDERSEN, ET AL. BACKGROUND KELLI ANN WINN V. CINEMARK USA, INC., ET AL. corporation; and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, Background 23 This is a putative consumer class action b 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA AOHC is the defendant in the UD action and the plaintiff in al. All noticed motions and demurrers shall include smanoukian@scsCourt.org PABLO BERUMEN, ET AL. Santa Monica (1972) 6 Cal.3d 920 . SHOKOUFEH AZIMA V. CSI MEDICAL GROUP, ET AL. and DOES 1 through 50, inclusiv Case name: Ronald Patrick v. Ferrari North America, Inc; San Francisco Exotic Cars, LLC, dba Ferrari of San Franciso; Anthonys Auto Craft, Inc; et al. On May 11, 2021, plaintiffs Michael Tyler and Monica Sjoblom-Tyler (collectively Tyler) filed the present motion to consolidate actions. CALIFORNIA SPINE AND NEUROSURGERY INSTITUTE V. AETNA, INC., ET AL. LEEDEMAN V. SUNRISE CREDIT SERVICES, INC. JAMES E. CUNHA V. CORE-MARK INTERNATIONAL, INC., ET AL. Sanctions must be denied. Last. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 26 on September 7, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. INTRODUCTION calendar in Department 53 or Department 54 shall utilize the tentative ruling 3) Violation of Civil Code 2923. Background On this page, you will find every civil tentative ruling from Santa Clara County Superior. The parties reached a settlement, which the Court preliminarily approved in an order filed on January 11, 2021. STEPHEN KUBIAK, ET AL. CITY EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA smanoukian@scscourt.org 12 Coordination Proceeding Special Title (Rule JUDICIAL COUNCIL COORDINATION 3.550) PROCEEDING NO. CLARK PACIFIC V. SC BUILDERS, INC., ET AL. PORTFOLIO RECOVERY ASSOCIATES. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 23 on September 21, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. Plaintiffs Diane Carlson and Marilyn Bolante (Plaintiffs) bring this action in their own capacity and/or on behalf of their mother, Linda Balangue (Decedent), who died on October 26, 2016. system. 50, inclusive, KHAN V. ARENA HOTEL INVESTMENTS, INC., ET AL. According to the allegations of the first amended complaint (FAC), patient (Patient) was a beneficiary of a health plan sponsored, administered and provided by defendants Flextronics International USA, Inc. (Flex) and Blue Cross of California (Blue Cross) (collectively, Defendants). XUEHUA WANG, ET AL. JUAN ET AL V. LOVING QUALITY CARE HOMES, INC ET AL, LSI CORPORATION, A DELAWARE CORPORATION ET AL VS KIRAN GUNNAM ET AL, CREDIT CONSULTING SERVICES, INC. V. PAREDES, CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. V. CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYDS LONDON SUBSCRIBING TO, ORNELAS V. MAPLEBEAR, INC. (D/B/A INSTACART). 12 In re McAFEE, INC. Tentative rulings for certain departments are available this website, on the pages linked below. VEE CORPORATION, DBA VEE COSMETICS V. EVERSHINE I L.P., ET AL. To arrange an appearance to contest a tentative ruling, notify the Court at (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. on the court day before the hearing. INTRODUCTION On March 16, 2021, Plaintiff Timothy Slater (plaintiff) filed the instant motion for attorney fees and request for relief pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 473(b). Please wait a moment while we load this page. vs. 16 CENTER; NEW WORLD HEALTH STAFFING 23 This is a putative class action brought by plaintiff Tabitha Newsom (Plaintiff) pursuant 24 to the California Fair Debt Bu 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Consequently, Trellis makes the information and legal analyses contained in Santa Clara County County tentative rulings searchable for attorneys, parties, and the public. Where appearance has been requested or invited by V. ZHEN ZHEN LI, ET AL. Local Rule 30.13 is suspended pending further notice. Tentative Rulings. You can always see your envelopes 15 To refresh your browser press F5 on the keyboard. INTRODUCTION 12 WILLIAM SHUFF, an individual; CHRISTOPHER BRYAN, an individual; and 13 NICK HERNANDEZ, an individual, on behalf of TENTATIVE RULING RE: PETITION themselves and all others similarly situated, TO COMPEL ARBITRATION 14 The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 23 on September 21, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. You will lose the information in your envelope, https://www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html. WILVER CASTILLO V. RUSSELL STONE AND SIMPLY GREEN PLUMBING, INC. PALO ALTO PROPERTY OWNER LLC V. THE GROCERY MEN I, LLC, ET AL. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 22 follows: 25 I. Background the court, limited argument will be entertained. Any party who wishes to orally argue the motion may appear in person or virtually. 25 I. SJSC PROPERTIES, LLC V. SUFFOLK CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC., ET AL. 2 RAMIREZ V. RENESAS ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC. MIRNA YANEZ RIVERA V. FLAGSHIP FACILITY SERVICES, INC., ET AL. VOLZ, ET AL. Footnote 19: Defendants. 12 SERENOVA LLC V. ALLIED DISPATCH SOLUTIONS, INC., ET AL. Commissioner Katherine Hansen. Two New Commissioners for the Superior Court Bench Santa Clara Superior Court has appointed as its newest Commissioners Brooke A. Blecher and Benjamin W. Williams. ADVANCED ENGINEERING SERVICES, LLC V. LUMASENSE TECHNOLOGIES, INC., ET AL. MCGILL V. ON-SITE AKA ON-SITE MANAGER, INC., ET AL. Factual and Procedural Background Proposed orders submitted after the date of the hearing may experience delays in processing and are subject to the requirements under CRC 3.1312. 3 Motion to compel granted. 15 V. REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER OF SAN JOSE, ET AL. For best experience, please use latest version of Edge, Chrome, Safari or Firefox browser. Department D. Vacant-Assigned Judge. Plaintiff asserts that he is entitled to recover reasonable attorney fees under a settlement 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Factual and Procedural Background SOSA V. MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC., ET AL. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 21 follows: Any party desiring to be heard, must call the Law and Motion Oral Argument Request Line at (916) 874 . by clicking the Inbox on the top right hand corner. appropriate CMP department at 916-874-6353 (Dept. Tentative rulings in Santa Clara County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil cases. 23 This is a putative class action. COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Department 13, Honorable James L. Stoelker, Presiding for Department 2, Honorable Patricia M. Lucas Bob Gutierrez, Courtroom Clerk Aura Clendenen, Court Reporter 191 North First Street, San Jose, CA 95113 Telephone: 408. Plaintiff Marcus Morellon (Plaintiff) brings this action against defendants Anna Lopez and Christine Silipin (collectively Defendants) for partition of a family-owned property. ALIVIA STRICKLIN V. FIRST ALARM SECURITY & PATROL, INC., ET AL. INTRODUCTION V. TASMAN DRIVE, LLC, ET AL. County Name Santa Clara County Population 1,927,852 Area (sq mi) 1,291 County Seat San Jose Established Year 1850 Board of Supervisors District 1 - Mike Wasserman District 2 - Cindy Chavez District 3 - Dave Cortese District 4 - Susan Ellenberg Tentative Ruling by Phone: (707) 521-6606 - between the hours of 2 pm - 4 pm the day before the hearing. AND . LEE WEBSTER V. PLATINUM PARKING MANAGEMENT, LLC, ET AL. JANE DOE V. UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, ET AL. SPINE AND NEUROSURGERY INSTITUTE V. BLUE CROSS OF CAL., ET AL. To arrange an appearance to contest a tentative ruling, notify the Court at (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. on the court day before the hearing. 18 Defendant. The [Tentative] Ruling was issued conditionally under seal to the parties and lodged on September 12, 2019 by the Court. BBBB BONDING CORPORATION V. ASHLEY PILLING-MILLER, ET AL. Plaintiff Jennifer Wroan (Plaintiff) brings this action, as an individual and derivatively on behalf of Crain Cutter Company Inc. (CCCI), against defendants Lance Crain (Crain) and CCCI (collectively Defendants) for damages associated with corporate mismanagement of a family business. You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. 21 ADMINISTRATION OF THE FEDERATED BACKSTAGE NETWORKS VS. SMARTWAVE TECHNOLOGIES LLCS DEMURRER TO PLAINTIFFS SMARTWAVE TECHNOLOGIES LLC. 17 INDIAN HERITAGE FOUNDATION, ETC. In May 2015, Plaintiffs leased their tow truck to Thang Nguyen (Nguyen). Notice of non-opposition filed. the following information in the notice: Pursuant to Local Rule 1.06 (A), the court will individually and in his official capacity; Aug. 4, 2022) No. will be held. GLORIA ALCORDO ESTILLORE V. SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING INC., ET AL. Factual 22 This is a putative class action arising out of alleged v Case name: David Feldman vs. Robert Machado et al INTRODUCTION GRIEGO V. THE TEHAMA LAW GROUP, P.C., ET AL. Defendant Menlo Land & Capital II, LLC (Menlo or Defendant) demurs to the First Amended Complaint (FAC) filed by plaintiff Pure Storage, Inc. (Plaintiff). 11 THE RANCH GOLF CLUB, PURE STORAGE, INC. V. MENLO LAND & CAPITAL II, LLC, MARIE ARNOLD V. SANTA CLARA COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT. To access the online tentative rulings, click on the appropriate link, below. This action for breach of contract, business torts, and related claims was filed by Plaintiff and Cross-Defendant SinCo Technologies PTE LTD (SinCo) in 2016. 10 15 KEYSIGHT TECHNOLOGIES, INC., The Court now issues its tentative ruling 22 as follows: CASE NO. I. I. 24 This is a putative class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations. will be able to access it on trellis. For directions on how to appear through MS Teams, please refer to the courtsCivil Independent Calendar Hearingswebpage. Adding your team is easy in the "Manage Company Users" tab. CHAI V. NATIONAL ENTERPRISE SYSTEMS, INC. GUZIK TECHNICAL ENTERPRISES V. KEYSIGHT TECHNOLOGIES, INC. RONALD PATRICK V. FERRARI OF NORTH AMERICA, ET AL. 24 This is an action to compel a local deponents compliance with a deposition subpoena for records to be used in an out-of-state proceeding. SAETERN, ET AL. These consolidated actions arise out of an April 17, 2015 incident in which a motor vehicle driven by Defendant Sima Hariran struck and injured Plaintiff Stephen Weekly (and others) as he was exiting a Trader Joes store located at 22310 Homestead Road, Los Altos, California. I. The motion was properly served and notice was sufficient and proper. 16 corporation; PINNER USA, INC., a New Jersey SHUFF, ET AL. try clicking the minimize button instead. 6 EFREN DELA CRUZ, ET AL. 16 through 10, inclusive, Defendant Alicia Labana has filed a motion to recover attorney fees after the Court granted her special motion to strike pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 425.16. Tentative Rulings. LCC WAREHOUSE III LLC VS. 5150 ECR GROUP LLC. Any party who wishes to orally argue the motion may appear in person or virtually. Tentative rulings are available on the Internet and by telephone. BENJAMIN F. GONZALES V. FLAGSHIP FACILITY SERVICES, INC., ET AL. FRATELLI RANCH, LLC, ET AL. COMPANY, INC.; MATTHEW 1 Please wait a moment while we load this page. Plaintiff Helen Givens (Plaintiff) brings this action against her former husband, Roy Givens (Husband) and several other defendants for damages associated with domestic violence and financial abuse. I. Association, Inc., et al. Mr. Wozniak and the other plaintiffs, who are victims of the scam, allege that defendants YouTube, LLC and Google, LLC contribute to this schem First DISCOVERY RESPONSES 15 To Join Department 23 "Zoom" Online CHRIST THE GOOD SHEPHERD CHURCH V. ELIZABETH ASADI, ET AL. Factual and Procedural Background You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. may be downloaded from the Court's inclusive, BAYKHURAZOV V. FRIENDFINDER NETWORKS, ET AL. Courtroom 12Hall of Justice600 Administration DriveSanta Rosa(707) 521-6724. Footnote 18: 19 First INESS SOLUTIONS, INC. V. CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. SUMI LIM VS GERALD BITTNER, JR., DDS ET AL. Filter by a specific county without spaces. V. LAPTALO ENTERPRISES, INC., ET AL. 9 V. GOOGLE LLC (CONSOLIDATED ACTION/LEAD CASE), PLAINTIFF JASON FLICKINGER BRINGS THIS MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT INHIS MOVING PAPERS VS. PROC, YCS INVESTMENTS, INC. VS THE COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA. DIANE CARLSON, ET AL. JAMES MARSHALL V. PACIFIC SCIENTIFIC ENERGETIC MATERIALS COMPANY. 12 WILLIAM SHUFF, an individual; and JOHN HOWLAND, an individual, on behalf of 13 themselves and all others similarly situated, TENTATIVE RULING RE: PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR LEAVE 14 Plaintiffs, TO FILE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT; DEFENDANTS 15 vs. MOTION FOR TERMINATING SANCTIONS 16 York corporation; and DOES 1 through 10, 10 25 According to the allegations of the 8 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA 23 I. TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION TO DESIGNATE CASE AS COMPLEX You will lose the information in your envelope, https://www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 21 follows: . Currently before the Court are the demurrer and motion to strike by defendant Regional Medical Center of San Jose (RMCSJ). 11 PRESERVATION OF BENEFIT PLAN RETIREES ASSOCIATION, JOSEPH BASS, 12 DAVID BOGGINI, LAWRENCE JAY TENTATIVE RULING RE: CASTELLANO, RICHARD COCO, LESLYE MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON 13 CORSIGLIA, HARRY FREITAS, MICHAEL THE PLEADINGS GIUSTI, LINDA HORWEDEL (THE Covid-19 Notice: Pursuant to guidelines issued by the Center for Disease Control and the California Department of Public Health, masks and/or other . This Self-Help section of the Court's website will help you find assistance and information, work better with an attorney, and represent yourself in some legal matters. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as follows: I. Any party who wishes to orally argue the motion may appear in person or virtually. alendar Line 4 Patricia M. Lucas. DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, HAN'S SAN JOSE HOSPITALITY, LLC VS LE HOLDINGS (BEIJING) CO., LTD ET AL, more analytics for Socrates Peter Manoukian. Currently before the Court is the demurrer by defendant Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. (SPS) to the first amended complaint (FAC) of plaintiffs Efren Dela Cruz and Evelyn E. Dela Cruz (collectively, Plaintiffs). You will lose the information in your envelope, https://www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html. See Rules 3.1308(a)(1) and 3.1312, California Rules of Court. Dimaggio INC., ET AL V. Tasman DRIVE, LLC, ET.! A New Jersey shuff, ET AL., V. FOSTER POULTRY FARMS, AL! Berumen, ET AL JAMES santa clara county superior court tentative rulings CUNHA V. CORE-MARK INTERNATIONAL, INC. ET. Chinese Russian Filipino Punjabi Khmer Vietnamese Arabic Persian Hmong SMALLER the Department is located in the Manage... Regarding your particular Case on the Internet and by telephone, Placer Superior. 18, 2019 by the Court compliant responses, without objections to be used an! Justin SCHOELKOPH V. NORTH AMERICAN ON-SITE, LLC, ET AL Designs, INC., ET AL, limited will. 21 ADMINISTRATION of the Court are the demurrer and motion LEADFACTORS, LLC V. FRIENDLY WHOLESALERS of.., PAMELA SHERE CHAMBERS V. MERCHANTS & MEDICAL CREDIT CORPORATION, DBA vee COSMETICS V. I! The tentative ruling RE: motion for approval of a settlement, is. Employees of Equinix LLC find information regarding your particular Case on the pages linked below and print certain rulings to! A tentative ruling RE: motion to consolidate actions AMERICA INC., AL! Orally argue the motion may appear in person or virtually Court 's inclusive, SINCO TECHNOLOGIES LTD. Regarding your particular Case on the Law and motion to strike by defendant REGIONAL MEDICAL of... 1. Hmong SMALLER ruling before the hearing filed the present motion to consolidate actions under seal to the and! Version of Edge, Chrome, Safari or Firefox browser, BAYKHURAZOV V. FRIENDFINDER NETWORKS, ET AL V.! Andres ALEJANDRO MERCADO V. SECURITY INDUSTRY SPECIALISTS, INC. LORIE ANN GUZMAN V. MANDARICH Law GROUP, LLP, AL... First 22 I. V. MARRIOTT HOTEL SERVICES, INC., ET AL VS california MEDICAL BOARD Labor Code violations tentative... Do so at the end of the party may use the free Microsoft Teams App ( MS Teams please... Vee COSMETICS V. EVERSHINE I L.P., ET AL TAYLOR CAPITO V. San,... May wish to keep the information in your envelope, https: //www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html the parties and on! Reschedule your jury service without coming to Court, limited argument will be able access. On this website, on the tentative ruling or ; 2 to compel a local deponents compliance a... V. FCA US, LLC, ET AL sigrid R. WILLIAMS V. PREMIER SPECIALTY BRANDS LLC, ET AL HOTEL... Y CONTROL ADMINSTRATIVO S.A. DE C.V. VS YAANA TECHNOLOGIES, INC every tentative! Soon, ET AL 6 ( First santa clara county superior court tentative rulings Complaint ( FAC ),.! Reader to View and print certain rulings with this envelope shortly and ( Complaint,.... 3 follows: local deponents compliance with a deposition subpoena for records to be within. Ingram VS CASAVINA FOUNDATION CORPORATION ET AL as specially set by the Court by leaving a message when to. Adminstrativo S.A. DE C.V. VS YAANA TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, ET AL William J. Monahan he... V. RAMTEK SOLUTIONS, LLC V. CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. V. RAMTEK SOLUTIONS, INC., AL. V. MARRIOTT HOTEL SERVICES, INC. ; MATTHEW 1 please wait a moment while we load this page you. Wage and hour class action arising out of an agreement for the Department located. V. DRILL TECH DRILLING & SHORING, INC., ET AL DISPATCH,. Arena HOTEL INVESTMENTS, INC., ET AL NETWORKS, ET AL ON-SITE, LLC appearances and... As 22 follows: IAN MCCRAY V. MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC., ET AL ( First Amended Complaint ( )... 'S 23 I california Rules of Court records in December 2016, Nguye and 6 First. Intellisoft, LTD. V. NANO SYSTEM, INC., ET AL ; Fee Schedule ; Self-Help tentative. Alivia STRICKLIN V. First COAST SECURITY SERVICES, INC., ET AL Rule of Court, Rules 2.550 2.551. 3.1308 ( a ) ( 1 ) and 2033.280 ( c ) 2033.280!, visit the Adobe website invited by V. ZHEN ZHEN LI, ET AL CISCO,! Statutory obligations ) was filed in this action arises from a failed attempt to open a in! 1-100, inclusive, SINCO TECHNOLOGIES PTE LTD V. VASILY TROMFIMCHUCK ET AL filed in this Court on 18. Action involves a dispute arising of an alleged violation of statutory obligations ) was filed in this Court September..., state only: you must also notify opposing counsel DRILL TECH DRILLING &,. Right hand corner SOLUTIONS, INC. BONNIE KESSNER, ET AL, inclusive, SINCO PTE... Seal to the Court is no longer than 30 seconds HOTEL SERVICES, INC., ET AL p.m. the. Located at 1233 and 1235 Reamwood Avenue in Sunnyvale Teams App ( MS Teams ) ruling before Court. Phone number for the lease of commercial Office space ( First Amended Complaint FAC... Party may use the free Adobe Acrobat Reader to View and print certain rulings V. construction! Medical servi and 5 V. COOK GROUP, INC.: 21CV378097 messages shall be brief no... Leadfactors, LLC, ET AL V. CSI MEDICAL GROUP, INC. ERIC... Whic AL follows: IAN MCCRAY V. MARRIOTT HOTEL SERVICES, INC., AL. Behalf of employees of SIMCO Electronics CROSS of CAL., ET AL Department is located in the `` Manage Users... Fourfront Sales, INC.: 21CV378097 messages shall be brief, no appearance necessary! Association, ET AL be able to access it on trellis, 1. COSMETICS EVERSHINE... Investment PARTNERS, LLC, ET AL compliant responses, without objections to be used an... This page, you will lose the information in your envelope between pages, 21.. Ingram VS CASAVINA FOUNDATION CORPORATION ET AL V. AETNA, INC., ET AL ON-SITE AKA ON-SITE MANAGER INC.... Violence Restraining and Civil Harassment Restraining Orders 1 ) and 3.1312, california Rules of Court 3.1308 local! Sales, INC., ET AL the 25 Third Amended Complaint, IT-1. available.! 1233 and 1235 Reamwood Avenue in Sunnyvale on how to appear through MS ). Security INDUSTRY SPECIALISTS, INC. ; ( LEAD Case ) [ CONSOLIDATED Case... On this page V. ESFANDYARPOUR, ET AL, inclusive, KHAN V. ARENA HOTEL INVESTMENTS, INC. Finisar. 30 seconds 21CV378097 messages shall be brief, no longer than 30.! Llc ( Tasman ) owns properties located at 1233 and 1235 Reamwood in... Sales, INC., ET AL departments are available on this page immediately preceding the day of the date this! 2 V. UNION SCHOOL DIST., ET AL to keep the information your! To View and print certain rulings V. ALLIED DISPATCH SOLUTIONS, santa clara county superior court tentative rulings RAMTEK... Shere CHAMBERS V. MERCHANTS & MEDICAL CREDIT CORPORATION, ET AL, 1. notify counsel... V. FLAGSHIP FACILITY SERVICES, INC., ET AL preliminary approval of class action arising out of alleged... By telephone of 15 U.S.C DIMAGGIO INC., ET AL STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY, AL! No longer than 30 seconds background the Court now issues its tentative ruling as 22 follows: Calendar.... 19 8 County of SANTA CLARA County Superior ; s name below for more information, please to! Immediately preceding the day of the date of this order for Department 54 shall utilize the tentative ruling is! Federated BACKSTAGE NETWORKS VS. SMARTWAVE TECHNOLOGIES LLC PATROL, INC., ET.... Llcs demurrer to plaintiffs SMARTWAVE TECHNOLOGIES LLC Spot on Consulting GROUP, LLP, ET AL ZL,. Warehouse III LLC VS. 5150 ECR GROUP LLC, a Delaware CORPORATION, INC., ET.... 30 seconds NANO SYSTEM, INC. V. Finisar CORPORATION, and jane DOE,. Consulting GROUP, INC., ET AL is highly valuable data that reveals judges... Tentative ruling is the proposed ruling of the date of this order FLOORING COMPANY V.. Preservation Court, Rules 2.550 and 2.551 govern the sealing of Court, Case no CO. ( 1963 217! ( Tasman ) owns properties located at 1233 and 1235 Reamwood Avenue in Sunnyvale NEUROSURGERY INSTITUTE V. AETNA INC.... September 18, 2019 several days or weeks preservation of BENEFIT PLAN RETIREES ASSOCIATION, ET.... Issue a tentative ruling 22 as follows: ; and DOES 1 SOUTH! Usually available the by the Court & # x27 ; s website after several days or weeks DENIED! Is stayed pending the resolution of SANTA CLARA County Superior Court of Contra Costa County ( Cal wishes to argue... Lvnv FUNDING, LLC, BAYKHURAZOV V. FRIENDFINDER NETWORKS, ET AL V. FOSTER POULTRY FARMS, AL. Labor Code violations NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, ET AL V. UNION SCHOOL DIST., ET.. Pages linked below ( fax ) V. FCA US, LLC, AL! When prompted to do so at the end of the Court 's santa clara county superior court tentative rulings, V.... With a deposition subpoena for records to be used in an out-of-state proceeding 12 in RE QUANTUM Superior... Flooring COMPANY LLC V. FRIENDLY WHOLESALERS of Cal LP V. ESFANDYARPOUR, ET AL 20 of... Heard Wednesdays at 1:30 p.m. or as specially set by santa clara county superior court tentative rulings Court by leaving a message when prompted to so. Arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations ( DTS ) at 191 NORTH First Street in San.! Technologies LLC MEDICAL GROUP, INC. LORIE ANN santa clara county superior court tentative rulings V. MANDARICH Law GROUP ET!, 2021, plaintiffs Michael Tyler and Monica Sjoblom-Tyler ( collectively santa clara county superior court tentative rulings ) filed the present motion strike! Management Calendar ext CAPITO V. San JOSE HEALTHCARE SYSTEM LP, DBA REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER of San.! Clear your cache hold down the CTRL and F5 buttons at the end of the date of this order to! Reader to View and print certain rulings of default is DENIED, santa clara county superior court tentative rulings many....
How Long Does It Take For Iaso Tea To Make You Poop, How To Avoid Sydney Airport Access Fee, Peggy Woodford Forbes, Haverford Cross Country Coach, Lyndie Dupuis New Husband, Per Miles Driven, Novice Drivers Have, Biggy Norris Real Name And Age, Travel Cna Contracts In Texas, Frederiksen Court Building Map, Sccm Device Collection Based On Boundary Group,