The suspension is effective on April 15, 2022. The Indiana Supreme Court suspended him for 180 days, with the suspension stayed after 90 days by a term of conditional probation of at least two years. Also, in the course of the disciplinary investigation, Mr. Cunningham made false statements to the ARDC about his use of a credit card account set up by his wife. The Supreme Court of Illinois imposed reciprocal discipline and also suspended him for six months. Reinstatement is not automatic and must be allowed by the Supreme Court of Illinois following a hearing before the ARDC Hearing Board. As an associate at a Chicago law firm, he falsely billed over 2,000 hours of time to a pro bono matter that had ended, which resulted in his being terminated. While representing a client in a criminal matter, she falsified her client's signature on a written arraignment form and then made misrepresentations to the court about what she had done. A suspension until further order of the Court is an indefinite suspension which requires the suspended lawyer to petition for reinstatement after the fixed period of suspension ends. He also failed to return unearned fees to the client; neglected a second client matter, resulting in the entry of a default judgment against the client; and failed to respond to requests for information and a subpoena to appear for a sworn statement. In re Nejla K. Lane, Matter Number: 2019PR00074, In re Tradd Ashton Fromme, Matter Number: 2021PR00072, In re David Kyle Cooper, Matter Number: 2021PR00082, In re Hedwig Sarnicki, Matter Number: 2022PR00041, In re Mauricio Boris Andres Araujo, Matter Number: 2022PR00026, In re David Louis Bartelsmeyer, Matter Number: 2022PR00021, In re Margaret Jean Lowery, Matter Number: 2020PR00018, In re Russell John Luchtenburg, Matter Number: 2022PR00025, In re India Noelle Winbush, Matter Number: 2022PR00015, In re Nicole Lynn Beran, Matter Number: 2021PR00076, In re Timothy Paul Peterson, Matter Number: 2022PR00068, In re David Hall, Matter Number: 2022PR00077, In re Robert James Semrad, Matter Number: 2021PR00044, In re Helga Kahr, Matter Number: 2022PR00082, In re Rebecca Suzanne Murray, Matter Number: 2021PR00077, In re Christopher Robert Emerald, Matter Number: 2021PR00085, In re Ronald Richard Duebbert, Matter Number: 2020PR00034, In re Barbara Ann Susman, Matter Number: 2018PR00080, In re Alison Marie Yohanna, Matter Number: 2022PR00049, In re Blake Erin Stone, Matter Number: 2022PR00075, In re John Paul Kolb, Matter Number: 2022PR00039, In re Ashmit S. Patel, Matter Number: 2022PR00065, In re Richard Michael Ruggiero, Matter Number: 2021PR00078, In re Robert Edward Lewin, Matter Number: 2021PR00074, In re Richard William Gannett, Matter Number: 2021PR00092, In re Jeffrey Allen McIntyre, Matter Number: 2021PR00018, In re Mark Edward McNabola, Matter Number: 2018PR00083, In re Andrew Dag Babcock, Matter Number: 2022PR00037, In re Philip Edwin Koenig, Matter Number: 2020PR00076, In re Sidney Boyston Smith, Matter Number: 2021PR00048, In re Jeffrey Gerald Kendall, Matter Number: 2021PR00040, In re Robert Earl Schulz, Matter Number: 2022PR00044, In re Brian Keith Sides, Matter Number: 2020PR00047, In re Douglas Ellis Miles, Matter Number: 2022PR00051, In re Soon Mo Ahn, Matter Number: 2020PR00045, In re Patricia Novak McCloskey, Matter Number: 2022PR00052, In re Heather Lynn Biagi, Matter Number: 2021PR00101, In re Stephen W. Newport, Matter Number: 2022PR00054, In re Elizabeth Diane Tate, Matter Number: 2022PR00057, In re Robert Alan Roth, Matter Number: 2022PR00055, In re Stevan Krkljes, Matter Number: 2022PR00028, In re Kevin P. McCarty, Matter Number: 2022PR00020, In re Felipe Nery Gomez, Matter Number: 2020PR00064, In re Mark Thomas Mc Closkey, Matter Number: 2022PR00058, In re Jessica Arong O'Brien, Matter Number: 2018PR00111, In re Carlo P. Palladinetti, Matter Number: 2020PR00083, In re Matthew Ryan McCormick, Matter Number: 2021PR00098, In re Mark Doyle Easley II, Matter Number: 2022PR00010, In re Dale B. Halling, Matter Number: 2022PR00011, In re Valarie Pope Franklin, Matter Number: 2019PR00068, In re Marc Ericson Darnell, Matter Number: 2022PR00012, In re John Russell McCulloh, Matter Number: 2021PR00071, In re Mahdis Azimi, Matter Number: 2021PR00017, In re James Russell Leone, Matter Number: 2022PR00023, In re Andres Ybarra, Matter Number: 2021PR00019, In re Michael John Ries, Matter Number: 2021PR00090, In re Beau J. While working as an investigator for the Civilian Office of Police Accountability ("COPA") in Chicago, she repeatedly, and without authorization, accessed a private database of police records in violation of the terms of her employment. His misconduct arose from his Michigan criminal convictions for manufacturing marijuana, maintaining a drug house, and possession of marijuana with the intent to deliver. The suspension is effective on June 8, 2021. The suspension is effective on October 14, 2021. The suspension is effective on February 7, 2023. Ill. S. Ct. R. 774(a)(1). A suspension until further order of the Court is an indefinite suspension which requires the suspended lawyer to petition for reinstatement after the fixed period of suspension ends. While handling a federal civil matter, she failed to comply with court orders to file certain documents by specific deadlines, did not address controlling caselaw in her arguments and pleadings or understand relevant legal documents or procedures, and did not review pleadings that her paralegal had drafted before she filed them with the court. Reinstatement is not automatic and must be allowed by the Supreme Court of Illinois following a hearing before the ARDC Hearing Board. Mr. Stephens, who was licensed in 1975, was suspended for one year and until further order of the Court. The Supreme Court of Illinois imposed reciprocal discipline and suspended her for six months and until she is reinstated to the practice of law in Arizona, followed by a term of probation subject to the conditions imposed in Arizona and continuing until her Arizona probation is completed. Mr. Baker, who was licensed in 1988, was suspended for one year and until further order of the Court, with the suspension stayed in its entirety by a two-year period of probation with conditions. She also did not communicate with clients about the status of their matters, inform her clients that she was closing her law practice, timely refund advanced fees that she had not earned, or safekeep client funds. He refused to withdraw his appearance in a client's dissolution of marriage case after the client's relative, who had been authorized as the client's attorney-in-fact, terminated his representation, and he filed frivolous pleadings and acted dishonestly to benefit himself in the matter. The Supreme Court of Illinois imposed reciprocal discipline and suspended her for six months and until further order of the Court, with the suspension stayed in its entirety by a one-year period of probation, nunc pro tunc to February 8, 2022, subject to the conditions imposed in Missouri and continuing until she successfully completes her Missouri probation. The suspension is effective on April 15, 2022. Ms. Lowery, who was licensed in 2000, was suspended for 30 days and required to successfully complete the ARDC Professionalism Seminar within one year. He mishandled over $70,000 in real estate escrow and earnest money funds by intentionally withdrawing funds from his firms client trust account, drawing the balance in that account below the amounts that should have been held. On March 18, 2021, the Virginia State Disciplinary Board entered an order suspending him for nine months, effective on September 19, 2022, when his current three-year Virginia suspension ends. In two cases, Mr. Wills failed to appear in court for clients, leading to the dismissal of the cases. Ms. VanAusdall then created a second proposed order that included provisions that had not been agreed upon and falsely assured the trial judge that opposing counsel had agreed to the order she was presenting. The Presiding Disciplinary Judge of the Supreme Court of Arizona reprimanded her and placed her on a one-year period of probation with conditions. A suspension until further order of the Court is an indefinite suspension which requires the suspended lawyer to petition for reinstatement after the fixed period of suspension ends. Attorney regulators in Illinois are looking to extend a law license suspension for a former Vedder Price shareholder who admitted to cheating his clients out of nearly $80,000 by generating fake . The Supreme Court of Illinois imposed reciprocal discipline and disbarred him. He was found by the ARDC's Hearing Board to have made false or reckless statements about the integrity and qualifications of a federal bankruptcy judge in nine motions and to have engaged in conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice. Mr. Weber, who was licensed in 1984, was disbarred. Reinstatement is not automatic and must be allowed by the Supreme Court of Illinois following a hearing before the ARDC Hearing Board. The suspension is effective on February 11, 2021. He accomplished the conversion by reactivating a dormant client account at the law firm at which he was a shareholder, creating and sending multiple false invoices, directing payments to the formally dormant account, and submitting fraudulent reimbursement requests to his firm's accounting department. The Supreme Court of Illinois imposed reciprocal discipline and suspended him for six months and until he is reinstated to the practice of law in Arizona. Mr. Groble, who was licensed in 1989, was suspended for two years and until further order of the Court. A suspension until further order of the Court is an indefinite suspension which requires the suspended lawyer to petition for reinstatement after the fixed period of suspension ends. While representing a physician in a business dispute in 2013, he did not timely respond to summary judgment motions filed by the defendants and did not file a brief in the resulting appeal despite receiving three extensions of time to do so. The Supreme Court of Illinois imposed reciprocal discipline and suspended him for 180 days, with the suspension stayed after 90 days by a two-year period of probation, nunc pro tunc to January 14, 2021, subject to the conditions imposed in Indiana, and continuing until his probation in Indiana is terminated. The suspension is effective on June 9, 2022. Between March and May 2018, Mr. Rueda converted over $15,000 in four client matters due in part to his failure to keep appropriate trust account records. The Supreme Court of Iowa suspended him with no possibility for reinstatement for 30 days. Mr. Field, who was licensed in 2011, was suspended for three years and until further order of the Court. The suspension is effective on December 7, 2021. Mr. Ybarra failed to diligently represent clients in several matters, including divorce and family-law cases, made misrepresentations to clients about the status of their matters, and did not refund unearned fees to a number of those clients. Mr. Sanchez was licensed in Illinois in 2003 and in Missouri in 2010. Ms. Doss, who was licensed in 1989, was disbarred on consent for dishonestly converting $8,767 in funds being held in trust for her client in a real estate transaction and for improperly withholding $3,875 in funds being held in trust for that same client. Attorney Registration & Disciplinary Commission of the Supreme Court of Illinois. In 2019 and 2020, Ms. Allen failed to diligently pursue two related immigration matters and repeatedly misled her clients about the status of those matters. The Supreme Court of Illinois imposed reciprocal discipline and suspended him for 30 days. Mr. Newport was licensed to practice in Illinois in 1990 and in Iowa in 1978. At the time of the conversion, Mr. Salgado was not maintaining the appropriate trust accounting records. Mr. Semrad, who was licensed in 1994, was suspended for 90 days and until further order of the Court. He failed to report his mother's death to her retirement benefit fund, and, for 10 months, he received and used $37,151 in annuity payments to which he was not entitled. While serving as a court-appointed public defender for a client, he made sexually explicit comments to the client, touched the client without her consent, and masturbated in front of the client in his office during a meeting about her case. Mr. Kowalski, who was licensed in 1990, was suspended on an interim basis and until further order of the Court. Ms. Lane, who was licensed in 2006, was suspended for nine months, with the suspension stayed after six months by a six-month term of probation with conditions. Reinstatement is not automatic and must be allowed by the Supreme Court of Illinois following a hearing before the ARDC Hearing Board. A lawyer who was twice found to have engaged in dishonest conduct, among other charges, should be suspended for one year, according to the Illinois Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission Hearing Board.Soon Mo Ahn, a Northbook lawyer, faced a two-count complaint from the ARDC administrator.The first count alleged that Ahn failed to withdraw from representation after being fired . The suspension is effective on December 7, 2021. The Virginia State Bar Disciplinary Board revoked his license to practice law and struck his name from the roll of attorneys after he failed to perfect the appeal of his client's criminal matter, resulting in the dismissal of his client's appeal. The Supreme Court of California suspended him for two years, stayed after 90 days by two years of probation with conditions, for misusing his client trust account over a 17-month period and failing to respond to California bar authorities' requests for information about his conduct. The suspension is effective on February 7, 2023. Mr. Smith, who was licensed in 1995, was suspended for three years and until further of the Court. Mr. Cohn, who was licensed in 1983, was suspended for six months and until he completes the ARDC Professionalism Seminar. He failed to diligently pursue several clients' dissolution of marriage cases, he did not keep those clients reasonably informed about their matters or promptly comply with their reasonable requests for information, and he failed to refund unearned fees. In 2019, she was convicted of driving under the influence of alcohol and other offenses after she drove into a police patrol car. The disbarment on consent was retroactive to Mr. Steckel's interim suspension from the practice of law on January 29, 2019. Ms. Allen, who was licensed in 2014, was suspended from the practice of law for one year and until further order of the Court. The Supreme Court of Illinois imposed reciprocal discipline and suspended him for two years in Illinois, stayed after 90 days by a term of probation subject to the conditions imposed in California and continuing until his California probation is satisfied. According to the release from the ARDC,. A suspension until further order of the Court is an indefinite suspension which requires the suspended lawyer to petition for reinstatement after the fixed period of suspension ends. Mr. Cooper, who was licensed in 2002, was suspended for three years and until further order of the Court. The suspension is effective on April 15, 2022. Mr. White, who was licensed in 2014, was suspended for two years and until further order of the Court, stayed after one year in favor of a three-year period of probation subject to conditions. The Supreme Court of Missouri entered an order suspending him indefinitely and staying the suspension in full in favor of a two-year period of conditional probation. Reinstatement is not automatic and must be allowed by the Supreme Court of Illinois following a hearing before the ARDC Hearing Board. The suspension is effective on February 11, 2021. He did not supervise non-lawyer employees of the firm who spoke with consumers about their potential bankruptcy matters, he did not supervise the handling of funds that clients paid to the firm, and he did not ensure that appropriate records were kept concerning the firms bank account. The Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts disbarred him for intentionally converting over $42,000 that he was supposed to be holding in connection with an insurance dispute. While representing the client in a criminal matter, he did not respond to the client's family's requests for information about the case, collected an unreasonable fee of $9,000 when he made no court appearances and filed no pleadings or briefs, and returned only $2,000 of the fee. Mr. White was licensed in Illinois in 1982 and in Maine in 1988. His misconduct arose from his August 2021 convictions of four counts of bankruptcy fraud and three counts of concealment of assets, for which he was sentenced to two years in prison. He recorded 277 hours in false time entries while working on a document review project for a large law firm. A suspension until further order of the Court is an indefinite suspension which requires the suspended lawyer to petition for reinstatement after the fixed period of suspension ends. The Supreme Court of Illinois imposed reciprocal discipline and suspended him for one year and until he is reinstated to the practice of law in Iowa. Mr. Gordon, who was licensed in 2010, was suspended for one year and until further order of the Court, stayed after six months by a six-month period of conditional probation. The Supreme Court of California disbarred him based on his attempt to extort more than $200,000 from his employer, which resulted in a misdemeanor conviction and five-month sentence of imprisonment for the federal criminal offense of unauthorized access to a computer to obtain information. Mr. Tanzillo, who was licensed in 1986, was suspended for four months and was required to complete the ARDC Professionalism Seminar within one year of the order of discipline. Mr. Araujo, however, retired from the bench one month before the Courts Commission entered its written findings on the ruling, thereby preventing the Courts Commission from pursuing discipline against him. Mr. Paleczny, who was licensed in 2018, was suspended for one year and until he completes the ARDC's professionalism seminar. The ARDC summaries contain the name of each disciplined lawyer, the community in which that lawyer last practiced, a brief summary of the misconduct and the disciplinary sanction ordered by the Court. Over the course of five months, he misappropriated over $30,000 from a supplemental needs trust established for his disabled client. The Supreme Court of Indiana suspended him for 180 days, with 60 days actively served and the remainder stayed subject to completion of at least two years of conditional probation. Mr. Lewin, who was licensed in 1974, was suspended from the practice of law for 60 days. Mr. Cunningham, who was licensed in 1994, was suspended for six months. The California Supreme Court suspended her for one year, with the suspension stayed by a one-year period of probation subject to conditions. In the course of representing clients in personal injury matters, he provided financial assistance to two clients, misrepresented the status of matters to at least two clients, and signed a client's name on a settlement release without authority. is anya epstein related to jeffrey epstein. Mr. Bowe had continued to practice law after the administrative suspension of his law license, and he did not maintain required trust account records. Mr. O'Shea, a former circuit court judge who was licensed in 1979, was suspended for one year and until further order of the Court. Mr. DeGrave, who was licensed in 2015, was suspended for one year and until further order the Court for striking his then-wife in the face during an argument, which led to injuries requiring surgery. Welcome to the Attorney Discipline Board. She assisted a disbarred attorney in the unauthorized practice of law by representing an individual in a workers' compensation case without the individual's consent, thereby allowing the disbarred attorney to falsely represent himself to the individual as being able to practice law. Mr. Patel, who was licensed in 2012, was suspended on an interim basis and until further order of the Court after he pled guilty in a California federal court to conspiracy to commit securities fraud and manipulative trading. The Supreme Court of Illinois imposed reciprocal discipline and censured him. The Supreme Court of Iowa reprimanded him for neglecting a client matter and failing to comply with Iowa disciplinary authorities' requests for information about his conduct. The Supreme Court of Illinois imposed reciprocal discipline and reprimanded her and placed her on probation for two years, nunc pro tunc to January 23, 2020, subject to the conditions imposed by Arizona, and until she successfully completes her Arizona probation. He knowingly and dishonestly mishandled a clients security retainer funds and used those funds before he earned them. He also misappropriated approximately $690,000 in funds that he had agreed to hold in trust related to two real estate transactions, transferred approximately $943,000 from his client trust accounts to his operating account without identifying the purpose of the disbursements or the client associated with them, and commingled more than $350,000 of operating account funds with client funds. His misconduct arose from his June 2021 conviction in Lake County for aggravated driving under the influence of alcohol, causing the death of another. He engaged in the unauthorized practice of law when he continued to practice law for eight months after his name was removed from the roll of licensed attorneys for failing to comply with Minimum Continuing Legal Education requirements. The Supreme Court of Missouri disbarred him for failing to perform services after accepting a fee, failing to properly hold client funds, failing to provide competent representation, and failing to cooperate in disciplinary investigations. He also prepared and had that defendant sign a typewritten incriminating statement, which he then filed with a motion to reduce bond in his own client's case. who owns hask hair products; psychiatric interviews for teaching: mania; einstein medical center philadelphia internal medicine residency; mel e learning elysium; silas weir mitchell disability; how to calculate probability less than in excel; how to light a water heater with electronic pilot rheem; lakers celebrity fans The suspension is effective on February 11, 2021. Ms. Susman, who was licensed in 1983, was suspended for five months, with the suspension stayed in full by one year of probation with conditions. Mr. Wittig was licensed in Illinois in 1992 and in Arizona in 1997. STATE SEEKS SUSPENSION OF ATTORNEY - Chicago Tribune The ARDC's offices are temporarily closed to the public due to COVID-19. Mr. Salgado, who was licensed in 1993, was suspended for one year with all but the first 30 days stayed by a one-year period of conditional probation. The Supreme Court of Illinois imposed reciprocal discipline and disbarred him. The suspension is effective on February 10, 2022. The Supreme Court of Illinois imposed reciprocal discipline and suspended him for six months and until he is reinstated to the practice of law in Missouri. He committed the criminal act of aggravated battery on one of his neighbors, a woman over 60 years of age. He failed to act with reasonable diligence in seeking a patent application for a client, he ignored the client's attempts to reach him and then made false statements to the client about the status of her matter, he failed to return $2,975 in fees he had not earned, and he did not cooperate with a disciplinary investigation. In another case, he represented a client despite a conflict of interest and acted dishonestly to benefit a third person in the transfer of a condominium via a quitclaim deed. Mr. Sides, who was licensed in 2002, was suspended on an interim basis and until further order of the Court. Mr. McNabola, who was licensed in 1985, was censured for misconduct in connection with two separate matters. Ms. VanAusdall, who was licensed to practice in 2003, was suspended for one year. He neglected two client matters and failed to communicate with those clients, and he concealed from a bankruptcy court his client's payment of attorney's fees to him. He engaged in conduct with no substantial purpose other than to embarrass, delay, and burden a third person in the course of pending litigation by using vulgar and abusive language toward his female opposing counsel during a deposition. Reinstatement is not automatic and must be allowed by the Supreme Court of Illinois following a hearing before the ARDC Hearing Board. He commingled and used without authority approximately $5,200 in others' funds in connection with real estate escrow and earnest money matters. The Supreme Court of Illinois imposed reciprocal discipline and suspended him for 180 days, with the suspension stayed after 60 days in favor of a two-year period of probation, nunc pro tunc to April 23, 2019, subject to the conditions imposed in Indiana and continuing until he successfully completes his Indiana probation. After the representation of that client ended and the client did not repay the loans, one of Mr. McNabola's partners represented Mr. McNabola's father in a collection lawsuit against the former client. He agreed to the purported settlement of an underinsured motorist claim against his client, an insurance company, for $75,000 without the company's authorization, and repeatedly made false statements to his opposing counsel about the status of the purported settlement. Mr. Banks, who was licensed in 1965, was suspended for two years and until further order of the Court and was required to demonstrate that he has paid $7,000 in restitution, plus interest, to his former client's sister prior to petitioning for reinstatement. Mr. Gonzalez, who was licensed in 2012, was suspended for one year and until further order of the Court. He also misrepresented his ownership interest in the company that was to receive the loan and withheld material details about the purpose of the loan. Mr. Babcock, who was licensed in 1992, was disbarred on consent. The suspension is effective on October 14, 2021. The suspension is effective on June 8, 2021. Debarment is the permanent suspension of a vendor from doing business with the OAG. In 2016 and 2107, he made false statements to the police and to the Judicial Inquiry Board about his contacts with a friend of his who was the subject of a criminal investigation. The Supreme Court of Illinois imposed reciprocal discipline and suspended him for nine months and until he is reinstated to the practice of law in Virginia, effective on October 13, 2023, when his current Illinois reciprocal suspension is due to end. She also settled a separate case without authority and made false statements to another attorney about the status of that case. Ms. Durbin was licensed in Missouri in 1986 and in Illinois in 1987. Mr. Tate was licensed in Missouri in 1995 and in Illinois in 1996. A suspension until further order of the Court is an indefinite suspension which requires the suspended lawyer to petition for reinstatement after the fixed period of suspension ends. In addition, he misrepresented to the ARDC the amount of restitution he had paid to the credit card company. Ms. Murray, who was licensed in 2013, was suspended for six months and until further order of the Court and until she completes the ARDC Professionalism Seminar. He abandoned his law practice and did not communicate with clients for an extended period. The Supreme Court of Illinois imposed reciprocal discipline and suspended her for six months and until she is reinstated to the practice of law in Arizona. She also engaged in the unauthorized practice of law for approximately two months after having been removed from the roll of attorneys for failure to register, and she made false statements to the ARDC during its investigation of her case. The suspension is effective on June 8, 2021. The Supreme Court of Illinois imposed reciprocal discipline and suspended him until he is reinstated to the practice of law in Virginia. The suspension is effective on June 9, 2022. an attorney who used at least $136,000 of his employer's funds without consent should be suspended for three years and until further order of the court, according to the illinois attorney registration and disciplinary committee hearing board.the administrator charged tradd ashton fromme with engaging in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit Mr. Weber did not participate in his Illinois disciplinary proceedings. He failed to pursue a client's personal injury case, allowing the statute of limitations to expire. He was found guilty of bank fraud after he participated in a multi-year scheme that provided fraudulent information to lenders in order to qualify buyers for mortgage loans to purchase condominium units owned by other participants in the scheme. Ms. Sarnicki, who was licensed in 1991, was suspended for 30 days. The suspension is effective on June 9, 2022. Mr. Leone was licensed to practice in Illinois in 1981 and in Florida in 1985. Mr. Mr. Araujo, who was licensed in 1993, was disbarred for sexually harassing three women: a Chicago police officer, a court reporter and an Assistant State's Attorney, while he was acting as a Cook County Circuit Court Judge. Mr. Lewin also sought to represent that defendant even though the representation would be directly adverse to, and materially limited by, his responsibilities to another client in a related case. A suspension until further order of the Court is an indefinite suspension which requires the suspended lawyer to petition for reinstatement after the fixed period of suspension ends. Antonio Brown was suspended from social media application Snapchat on Tuesday after he was reported by the mother of his children for posting sexually explicit photos of her on his story, TMZ . Over a period of approximately three weeks in 2015, she sent dozens of emails, text messages, and other communications to attorneys in Florida with whom she was then engaged in a dispute. Reinstatement is not automatic and must be allowed by the Supreme Court of Illinois following a hearing before the ARDC Hearing Board. The suspension is effective on April 15, 2022. This page contains ARDC summaries of recent disciplinary decisions issued by the Supreme Court of Illinois. Mr. Bracamonte filed asylum applications without an indicated basis for asylum, he canceled asylum interviews or advised his clients not to appear for asylum interviews, and he failed to demonstrate a clear intention to pursue an asylum claim, causing prejudice to his client. In December 2020, the Supreme Court of Florida granted Mr. Leone's petition for disciplinary revocation of his law license, with leave to seek readmission after five years. Ms. Sodaro was licensed in Illinois in 1986 and in Arizona in 2017. In three separate legal matters, he repeatedly sent threatening and harassing email messages to other attorneys. The Supreme Court of Illinois imposed reciprocal discipline and disbarred him. The suspension is effective on June 9, 2022. Mr. Pomrenze, who was licensed in 1984, was suspended for five months and until further order of the Court, with the suspension stayed in its entirety by two years of conditional probation. If an objection is filed, the suspension shall not become effective until the evaluation of the objection is completed. The law firm refunded the client's overpayment. The suspension is effective on June 8, 2021. Ms. Sodaro was licensed in Illinois in 1986 and in Arizona in 2017. In September 2021, a Michigan jury found him guilty of three counts of criminal sexual conduct. Mr. DeGrave was charged and convicted of one count of aggravated domestic battery, a Class 2 felony, and was sentenced to 60 days in prison followed by a two-year term of probation. The Supreme Court of Iowa suspended him for 30 days for failing to communicate with a client, collecting an unauthorized fee in a Social Security disability benefits matter, neglecting a client's case, and mishandling client funds. The suspension is effective on February 7, 2023. Mr. He was found guilty following a jury trial of two charges of knowingly making false statements to a financial institution and five charges of tax fraud. While representing a recently-widowed woman in matters relating to the administration of her deceased husbands estate, he collected an unreasonable fee of $20,000 for preparing new estate-planning documents for the woman and her adult daughter and for incorporating a business for the daughter, and he sought an additional $25,729.75 in fees that the client did not pay. She pled guilty to misdemeanor harassment for pointing a semi-automatic pistol at a group of protesting individuals outside of her home, with the purpose of causing emotional distress. The Supreme Court of Illinois imposed reciprocal discipline, reprimanded him, and placed him on probation for two years, nunc pro tunc, to October 31, 2019, subject to the disciplinary conditions imposed in Arizona. Johnson, Matter Number: 2022PR00007, In re Jessica Rose Allen, Matter Number: 2021PR00055, In re Roni S. VanAusdall, Matter Number: 2021PR00039, In re Patrick Daley Thompson, Matter Number: 2022PR00014, In re Paul D. Buhl, Matter Number: 2021PR00075, In re Robert John Hankes, Matter Number: 2019PR00102, In re Brent Michael Wills, Matter Number: 2021PR00021, In re Timothy J. Fitzgerald, Matter Number: 2017PR00116, In re Michael Christopher Burr, Matter Number: 2021PR00004, In re Mark A. Hamill, Matter Number: 2021PR00016, In re Edward William Hynes, Matter Number: 2021PR00065, In re Jeffrey Marc Benjamin, Matter Number: 2021PR00052, In re William John Bowe, Matter Number: 2021PR00058, In re Patrick Jon Hudec, Matter Number: 2021PR00060, In re Thomas Michael Barrett, Matter Number: 2021PR00064, In re Jennifer Prager Sodaro, Matter Number: 2021PR00066, In re Robert Lee Officer, Matter Number: 2021PR00068, In re Sean Michael Liles, Matter Number: 2020PR00022, In re Leijuana Doss, Matter Number: 2021PR00022, In re Wanemond Smith, Matter Number: 2020PR00089, In re John P. Jacoby, Matter Number: 2021PR00067, In re Michael Leonard Loprieno, Matter Number: 2019PR00101, In re James Robert Mason, Matter Number: 2021PR00045, In re Todd William Sivia, Matter Number: 2021PR00015, In re Matthew Clay Piatt, Matter Number: 2021PR00024, In re Carrie Kooi, Matter Number: 2021PR00023, In re Barbara Julia Luther, Matter Number: 2021PR00025, In re Michael Bernard Potere, Matter Number: 2021PR00026, In re Cynthia Jean Koroll, Matter Number: 2016PR00079, In re Lisa Michelle Edgar, Matter Number: 2021PR00027, In re Craig Carnell Cunningham, Matter Number: 2019PR00019, In re Donald George Groble, Matter Number: 2020PR00081, In re Bryan S. Flangel, Matter Number: 2021PR00029, In re Andrew Martin Stroth, Matter Number: 2019PR00065, In re Alan Kent Wittig, Matter Number: 2021PR00033, In re John Anthony Ward, Matter Number: 2021PR00034, In re Henry A. Weber, Matter Number: 2020PR00087, In re James Mark McTighe, Matter Number: 2021PR00035, In re Efrain L. Sanchez, Matter Number: 2021PR00036, In re John George Steckel, Matter Number: 2021PR00038, In re Stephen Thomas Fieweger, Matter Number: 2021PR00042, In re Veronica Reyes, Matter Number: 2021PR00043, In re Peter J. Kovac, Matter Number: 2021PR00046, In re Edward Sergio Rueda, Matter Number: 2020PR00042, In re Brian David Pondenis, Matter Number: 2020PR00048, In re Mark Vincent Kelly, Matter Number: 2020PR00029, In re Barry Edward Blumenfeld, Matter Number: 2021PR00057, In re Stephanie Alexandra Gerstetter, Matter Number: 2021PR00050, In re Nathaniel Gordon, Matter Number: 2020PR00059, In re Jessica Lynn Jones, Matter Number: 2021PR00020, In re John Paul Paleczny, Matter Number: 2021PR00051, In re Jennifer Prager Sodaro, Matter Number: 2020PR00080, In re Jeffrey P. White, Matter Number: 2021PR00003, In re Hrant Norsigian Jr., Matter Number: 2021PR00005, In re Marie A. Durbin, Matter Number: 2021PR00006, In re Radford Reuben Raines III, Matter Number: 2021PR00007, In re Eric James Dale, Matter Number: 2021PR00009, In re Howard Randolph Baker Jr., Matter Number: 2020PR00061, In re Michael Lee Henneberry, Matter Number: 2021PR00011, In re John Thomas Sheets, Matter Number: 2020PR00075, In re Dwight White, Matter Number: 2020PR00006, In re John L. Allen, Matter Number: 2021PR00013, In re William Briskin Kohn, Matter Number: 2019PR00008, In re Nikola Duric, Matter Number: 2015PR00052, In re Shelby Kanarish, Matter Number: 2021PR00014, In re Patrick J. O'Shea, Matter Number: 2020PR00037, In re Joseph C. Farwell, Matter Number: 2019PR00089, In re Lee Jackson, Matter Number: 2020PR00079, In re Joshua Nathan Levy, Matter Number: 2020PR00082, In re Rufus James Tate Jr., Matter Number: 2020PR00085, In re Michael Jerome Moore, Matter Number: 2020PR00017, In re Ryne DeGrave, Matter Number: 2020PR00044, In re Jose Arvizu Bracamonte, Matter Number: 2021PR00001, In re Burton Douglas Stephens Jr., Matter Number: 2020PR00021, In re Oscar Antonio Gonzalez, Matter Number: 2018PR00066, In re Nathaniel Jay Pomrenze, Matter Number: 2019PR00059, In re John Henry Salgado, Matter Number: 2019PR00073, In re Christopher Steven Jones, Matter Number: 2020PR00067, In re John Christopher Carver, Matter Number: 2020PR00074, In re Jan R. Kowalski, Matter Number: 2020PR00077, In re Robert Michael Kowalski, Matter Number: 2020PR00078, In re William Layne Roberts, Matter Number: 2019PR00021, In re Jeffrey Bart Cooper, Matter Number: 2020PR00066, In re Vincenzo Field, Matter Number: 2018PR00015, In re Thomas Eric Wettermann, Matter Number: 2020PR00031, In re Franklin Joseph Furlett, Matter Number: 2019PR00028, In re Charles Andrew Cohn, Matter Number: 2018PR00109, In re Joan Arthetta Hill-McClain, Matter Number: 2017PR00100, In re Andrew Thomas Freund, Matter Number: 2020PR00070, In re Dean William O'Connor, Matter Number: 2020PR00071, In re Mary L. Lemp, Matter Number: 2020PR00072, In re Anish A. Parikh, Matter Number: 2019PR00005, In re David M. Jankura, Matter Number: 2018PR00052, In re Shirley Ruth Calloway, Matter Number: 2020PR00032, In re John Hudson McWard, Matter Number: 2020PR00008, Pending Motions for Disbarment on Consent. clinicians face an ethical dilemma when they, royal family crimes against humanity, has produced plants that are resistant to herbicides quizlet, palabras para describir a una mujer especial, harry styles dunkirk timestamps, police defensive tactics instructor course, magda squash recipe, really big numbers, lafayette fire department chief, nathania stanford biography, kingston family utah net worth, bill belichick house franklin, tn, prescott wisconsin police department, game changer delete opponent team, julie cooper daughter of jackie cooper,
Midwest City Warrant Search, Priority Housing Waiting List Qld, Joel King Actor Obituary, Apa In Text Citation Multiple Authors Example, Mansfield St Peter's School Calendar, Sample Amended Complaint Federal Court,